From boondoggle to backers: How the NDP changed its stance on the John Horgan Dam (2026)

The John Horgan Dam, a colossal engineering marvel in British Columbia, stands as a testament to the province's commitment to renewable energy and economic development. However, the story of this project is not just about its impressive scale but also about the dramatic political shift it represents. The NDP's transformation from critics to champions of the dam is a fascinating case study in policy evolution and the complexities of governance.

The dam's sheer size is awe-inspiring. Its crest stretches over a kilometer, and the pipes that channel water to power-generating turbines are massive, each 11 meters in diameter. The powerhouse, spillway, and dam buttress, constructed with two million cubic meters of roller-compacted concrete, dwarf the world's tallest building, the Burj Khalifa, in terms of concrete usage. This scale is not just physical but also symbolic of the project's significance.

The political journey of the John Horgan Dam is a remarkable one. When the project was known as Site C, it was criticized by the NDP's former leader, John Horgan, as a Liberal boondoggle. He questioned the project's necessity and the potential mismanagement of provincial finances. However, under the leadership of Premier David Eby, the NDP has embraced the project, recognizing its potential to provide cheap and reliable electricity, a crucial asset in a competitive economic landscape.

Eby's admiration for the dam is palpable. His gasp at the sight of the giant pipes and his enthusiastic description of it as 'Star Wars' showcase a visceral connection to the project. This shift in sentiment is not just a personal transformation but a strategic one, aimed at addressing the province's energy needs and economic challenges.

The NDP's stance on new dams has evolved significantly. Energy Minister Adrian Dix has hinted at a potential fourth Peace River dam, Site E, and even a more ambitious 900-megawatt project near Bute Inlet. This shift suggests a broader recognition of the need for additional power generation to meet the province's energy demands and economic goals.

However, this shift in policy has not been without controversy. Ken Boon, from the Peace Valley Landowner Association, expressed disappointment, recalling the loss of farmland due to the John Horgan Dam. The potential construction of more dams raises concerns about environmental impact and the displacement of communities, highlighting the challenges of balancing economic development with environmental and social considerations.

The John Horgan Dam project has been a long and complex journey, marked by political shifts and public debate. The NDP's transformation from critic to champion of the project reflects a broader understanding of the challenges and opportunities in British Columbia's energy sector. As the province continues to navigate its energy future, the dam stands as a symbol of both the potential benefits and the complexities of large-scale infrastructure development.

From boondoggle to backers: How the NDP changed its stance on the John Horgan Dam (2026)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Nathanael Baumbach

Last Updated:

Views: 6272

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nathanael Baumbach

Birthday: 1998-12-02

Address: Apt. 829 751 Glover View, West Orlando, IN 22436

Phone: +901025288581

Job: Internal IT Coordinator

Hobby: Gunsmithing, Motor sports, Flying, Skiing, Hooping, Lego building, Ice skating

Introduction: My name is Nathanael Baumbach, I am a fantastic, nice, victorious, brave, healthy, cute, glorious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.